How dare you post an image of this tbh average looking fella without also showcasing his absolutely amazingly dumptrucky booty, ass cheeks so caked up you should ask the gods for forgiveness for keeping it hidden:
They say you don’t ever hear the fluttering of his gentle wings, but his dummy thicc clappening is deafening.
For an economy focused on consumption/spending this is the end of the line (end of growth).
(This isn’t bad for the people, it’s “bad for the economy” if “the economy” is measured by GDP & stock markets.)
They sucked what juices the lower class had left, then middle class, now (lower) upper class is failing too.
Of which a lot fall under the penis lust too.
Penis sloth: specialised tendons that lock into place give them the power to hang on for long periods of time without wasting any energy, even while sleeping.
Such a natural jorker tho.
Wrath: that’s just pp bdsm.
That’s just metalhead bros.
I’m not one of those people that needs to eat at precise intervals or even every day. I just eat when in hungry for something.
In summer dinner is usually my first (and often only) meal.
I almost never eat breakfasts (especially if I woke up “only” a few hours ago). Never could, even parents wanted me to but I just had better days without breakfast as a kid so they stopped insisting.
I assume that when I travel I have access to food basically everywhere or else I know I have to plan that - which again I do in a way that I eat when I want.
Well, I probably woke up all of them 2 hours earlier stumbling to my(-ish) room.
(Just kidding, I super don’t like to make noise regardless of my state.)
Yes, def this.
I trust housekeeping just walks in, sees me sleeping, gently smooch me on the forehead & quietly leave the room.
Stupid sexy blankets that are wearing nothing at all!!
Not if I’m by myself in the hotel/trip.
I/someone paid for the bed & I’m gonna use it.
*monetary value
(in relation to toxic culture)
(bcs value that people actuality bring to society often isn’t fairly valued in terms of money or even not at all)
Even if so - the definition of oneself is what that person gets paid for, not what that person enjoys doing (or even is just good at)?
(Especially with jobs, folk on LinkedIn will describe their job as anything but their actual everyday job, or lie/exaggerate about their job when with other people - so not even that “role” is true.)
… like, lmao, except if it’s like a weird grinding kink or something.
I think there is no possible world where people are without meaningful work and are happy about it.
–>
Even if they collected $10,000 a month and got to spend all of their time doing hobbies and spending time with family, it would feel pointless and hollow.
What is the difference between “hobby” and “work” if not what random people decide what is better monetised?
Both is labour & value added.
In a world where everyone gets enough money people could do what they actually want. So a CEO wouldn’t be “stuck” being a CEO if they don’t like that job & would rather be eg a baker. In the current system bcs of a huge pay divergence you get an unhappy CEO (who ofc won’t quit) and an unhappy baker that just couldn’t get a more suited paying job.
But we as a society would get a lot more out of life & cultural progression if people would be happy & satisfied at what they do (job=hobby).
Empirical evidence (even USA did extensive tests in the 60s) show that given a universal income (so basically no scarcity) basically nobody just sits around watching TV all day, everyone is productive (research, art, services, etc).
Imagine only having customer support or food industry workers that truly enjoy their job & want to do it.
How many prodigies are stuck at random dead end jobs with no prospects and life options?
Labour is what we all benefit from.
Work is what the employer/owner benefits from.
An average Dark Souls enjoyer??
Yeah, but internet was for the people for decades.
(And it didn’t really cost nature as much. Or stolen from the people so much - even by current laws LLM companies do that illegally.)
“AIs” are getting their enshitification & monopolies pre-baked into their core bossiness models from the start.
Not to mention that AIs will definitely worsen inequalities all over the world (like assembly robots that replaced people but aren’t owned by people, and people still need to work 8h/day for decades for some reason).
(This but AI. I’m not saying, there aren’t/won’t be other jobs, just pointing out how this reshapes & concentrates wealth that on the other hands allows for slave wages with no prospects for full time jobs.)
If AIs will affect the world as much as the internet (and do so with peoples data), then they should be seen as core infrastructure - and government or non-profit owned.
Monetisation of all the things is killing us.
Or just preemptively reply with the second bit.
The most eco friendly thing anyone can possibly do.